Greenpeace’s 2016 and 2017 protest campaign against Energy Transfer’s Dakota Access Pipeline was one of the group’s most ...

Here's a look at the environmental group Greenpeace, which must pay more than $650 million in damages linked to Dakota Access ...

A pipeline company’s lawsuit against the environmental group could chill free speech, experts said. First Amendment issues ...

Greenpeace testified that it played only a minor, supporting role in the protests against the pipeline, which it pointed out was led by the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe. Tribal chairwoman Janet Alkire ...

Potential closure of U.S. offices if the ruling stands.

CIVICUS speaks with Daniel Simons, Senior Legal Counsel Strategic Defence for Greenpeace International, about the lawsuit ...

Greenpeace is clearly seen as a threat to oil and gas interests and is a target for increasingly common efforts to silence opposition.

A judge has dismissed the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe’s lawsuit against the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers seeking to shutter the Dakota Access Pipeline.

The environmental group is clearly seen as a threat to oil and gas interests and is a high-profile target for increasingly common efforts to silence opposition.

International Rivers denounces the SLAPP ruling against Greenpeace and all attempts to silence those who speak out against ...

An interview with Greenpeace International General Counsel Kristin CasperOnward. Because we will not back down. We will not ...

A Morton County jury on March 19 found Greenpeace must pay hundreds of millions of dollars to a pipeline company in connection with protests against the Dakota Access oil pipeline. The jury found ...