3. Heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant and the learned counsel appearing for the State of Tamil Nadu. 4. As noted above, the appellant is charge sheeted only under Section 27 ...

During the course of investigation, it was found that the said Anil Kumar Sethi entered in service as Stipendiary Engineer in the year 1993 in Orissa State Housing Board Corporation and worked there ...

On going through the contents of the application preferred under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and also to meet the ends of justice, we deem it appropriate to set aside the order ...

4. We have heard Shri S. Nagamuthu, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant and Shri N.R. Elango, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the State of Tamil Nadu.

1. This appeal challenges the order of the Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) Regional Bench, Lucknow dated 05.01.2022 in Original Application No. 241 of 2021. By the said order, the AFT dismissed the ...

2. The Union of India is in appeal against the judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Patna1 allowing the writ petition filed by the respondent challenging the order of the ...

25. This Court in Ude Singh v. State of Haryana10, held that to convict an accused under Section 306 IPC, the intent or mental state to commit the specific crime must be evident when assessing ...

Muthupandi Vs. State through the Inspector of Police, Nilakottai Station, Dindigul ...

19. In State of Odisha v. Anup Kumar Senapati7, after noticing a series of decisions, a three-Judge Bench of this Court rejected an argument that petitioners must get the benefit of parity even if ...

An Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to juveniles in conflict with law and children in need of care and protection, by providing for proper care, protection and treatment by catering to ...